Chinese vs Israeli Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Chinese
Israeli
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Chinese
Israelis
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
80.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
149th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Israeli Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,759,689 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.266 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,541,802 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.343 and weighted average of 15.5%, a difference of 30.2%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Israeli |
Minimum | 2.3% | 0.61% |
Maximum | 56.0% | 42.3% |
Range | 53.7% | 41.7% |
Mean | 14.3% | 16.0% |
Median | 11.6% | 14.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 19.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 12.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 11.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 10.9% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), Iranian (12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), Thai (11.6%, a difference of 3.1%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and Immigrants from Iran (12.4%, a difference of 3.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Israelis by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are Puget Sound Salish (15.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Kuwait (15.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Slovak (15.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Immigrants from Peru (15.5%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Jordan (15.6%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Brazilians | 82.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 15.4% |
Icelanders | 82.5 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Peru | 81.7 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.5% |
Slovaks | 81.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 80.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 80.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.5% |
Israelis | 80.1 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 78.5 /100 | #150 | Good 15.6% |
French | 78.5 /100 | #151 | Good 15.6% |
French Canadians | 78.2 /100 | #152 | Good 15.6% |
Venezuelans | 77.4 /100 | #153 | Good 15.6% |
Samoans | 77.3 /100 | #154 | Good 15.6% |
Syrians | 76.1 /100 | #155 | Good 15.6% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 74.9 /100 | #156 | Good 15.7% |