Chinese vs Iranian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Chinese
Iranian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Chinese
Iranians
11.9%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
5th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
7th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Iranian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,759,689 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.266 and weighted average of 11.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 314,255,547 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Iranians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 2.6%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Iranian |
Minimum | 2.3% | 0.81% |
Maximum | 56.0% | 17.9% |
Range | 53.7% | 17.1% |
Mean | 14.3% | 7.7% |
Median | 11.6% | 6.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.7% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 17.0% | 10.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.3% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.5% | 3.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Iranians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 1.8%), Thai (11.6%, a difference of 3.1%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.4%, a difference of 3.7%), Immigrants from Iran (12.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Hong Kong (12.1%, a difference of 0.76%), Immigrants from Singapore (12.4%, a difference of 1.1%), Immigrants from Iran (12.4%, a difference of 1.2%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (12.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and Bhutanese (12.5%, a difference of 2.4%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 10.8% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 11.0% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 11.1% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 12.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.9 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 12.5% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 12.7% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 12.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 12.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Cypriots | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.8 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.0% |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.1% |