Chinese vs Immigrants from Iran Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from Iran
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from Iran
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.3%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
21st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Immigrants from Iran Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 279,394,600 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Iran and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.246 and weighted average of 7.3%, a difference of 11.7%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Immigrants from Iran |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.76% |
| Maximum | 19.1% | 15.8% |
| Range | 17.8% | 15.0% |
| Mean | 6.8% | 6.3% |
| Median | 6.3% | 5.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 7.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 3.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 3.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 3.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Immigrants from Iran by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Iran are Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.20%), Eastern European (7.2%, a difference of 0.36%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.67%), Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.90%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.3% |