Chinese vs Eastern European Family Poverty
COMPARE
Chinese
Eastern European
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Chinese
Eastern Europeans
6.5%
FAMILY POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Eastern European Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,784,795 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.039 and weighted average of 6.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,080,941 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Eastern Europeans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.527 and weighted average of 7.2%, a difference of 11.3%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Eastern European |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.82% |
| Maximum | 19.1% | 60.3% |
| Range | 17.8% | 59.5% |
| Mean | 6.8% | 10.1% |
| Median | 6.3% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.5% | 3.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.0% | 9.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.5% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 13.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 13.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Eastern Europeans by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Taiwan (6.6%, a difference of 1.6%), Filipino (6.6%, a difference of 2.2%), Thai (6.7%, a difference of 2.8%), Immigrants from India (6.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and Norwegian (6.9%, a difference of 5.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Eastern Europeans are Immigrants from Hong Kong (7.3%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Lithuania (7.2%, a difference of 0.30%), Luxembourger (7.2%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (7.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and Lithuanian (7.2%, a difference of 0.81%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 6.2% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 99.9 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Bulgarians | 99.8 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 99.8 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.8 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.8 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.7 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.7 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.3% |