Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guyana Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Immigrants from Guyana
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Immigrants from Guyana
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
260th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Guyana Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,220,722 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 183,633,406 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.038 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 0.11%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cherokee | Immigrants from Guyana |
Minimum | 2.3% | 0.82% |
Maximum | 61.8% | 30.8% |
Range | 59.5% | 30.0% |
Mean | 21.9% | 14.1% |
Median | 19.3% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.3% | 10.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.5% | 17.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 6.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 5.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.5% | 5.7% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Immigrants from Guyana by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Guyana are Cape Verdean (15.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.10%), Shoshone (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |
Shoshone | 0.1 /100 | #258 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.1 /100 | #259 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.1 /100 | #260 | Tragic 15.6% |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |