Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bahamas Female Poverty
COMPARE
Cherokee
Immigrants from Bahamas
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Cherokee
Immigrants from Bahamas
15.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
263rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.1%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
279th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cherokee vs Immigrants from Bahamas Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 493,220,722 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.397 and weighted average of 15.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,605,923 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Bahamas and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.084 and weighted average of 16.1%, a difference of 2.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cherokee | Immigrants from Bahamas |
Minimum | 2.3% | 3.7% |
Maximum | 61.8% | 39.4% |
Range | 59.5% | 35.8% |
Mean | 21.9% | 17.5% |
Median | 19.3% | 16.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.3% | 14.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.5% | 19.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.2% | 5.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.5% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.5% | 6.7% |
Demographics Similar to Cherokee and Immigrants from Bahamas by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Cherokee are Guyanese (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Mexican American Indian (15.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ecuador (15.6%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Liberia (15.7%, a difference of 0.42%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (15.7%, a difference of 0.49%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Bahamas are Immigrants from West Indies (16.1%, a difference of 0.12%), Vietnamese (16.1%, a difference of 0.24%), West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Bangladeshi (16.0%, a difference of 0.42%), and Central American (16.0%, a difference of 0.61%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Guyanese | 0.1 /100 | #261 | Tragic 15.6% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 15.6% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |
Immigrants | West Indies | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 16.1% |
Immigrants | Bahamas | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 16.1% |
Vietnamese | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 16.1% |
West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 16.1% |