Canadian vs Jordanian Male Poverty
COMPARE
Canadian
Jordanian
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Canadians
Jordanians
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
MALE POVERTY
94.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
92nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Canadian vs Jordanian Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,032,660 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.661 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,386,715 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.209 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 1.1%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Canadian | Jordanian |
Minimum | 2.0% | 2.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 30.3% |
Range | 98.0% | 28.2% |
Mean | 23.8% | 10.5% |
Median | 12.5% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.3% | 13.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.5% | 6.4% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.0% | 5.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.7% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Canadians and Jordanians by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Welsh (10.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (10.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), French Canadian (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and Laotian (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Australian (10.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from South Africa (10.4%, a difference of 0.17%), British (10.4%, a difference of 0.20%), Scottish (10.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Indian (Asian) (10.4%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
Cambodians | 95.0 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.0 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 94.9 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 10.4% |
British | 94.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Jordanians | 94.4 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Australians | 94.4 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 94.1 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Scottish | 94.0 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Immigrants | Egypt | 93.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 10.4% |
Romanians | 93.6 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Finns | 93.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 93.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 92.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 10.5% |
French Canadians | 91.9 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Slavs | 91.7 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Welsh | 91.6 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |