Canadian vs Immigrants from Norway Male Poverty
COMPARE
Canadian
Immigrants from Norway
Male Poverty
Male Poverty Comparison
Canadians
Immigrants from Norway
10.5%
MALE POVERTY
91.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.7%
MALE POVERTY
86.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
125th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Canadian vs Immigrants from Norway Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 437,032,660 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Canadians and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.661 and weighted average of 10.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,684,379 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and poverty level among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.476 and weighted average of 10.7%, a difference of 1.5%.
Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Canadian | Immigrants from Norway |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 0.44% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 58.1% |
| Range | 98.0% | 57.6% |
| Mean | 23.8% | 9.4% |
| Median | 12.5% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.8% | 4.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 27.3% | 9.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.5% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 25.0% | 11.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 24.7% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Canadians and Immigrants from Norway by Male Poverty
In terms of male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Canadians are Immigrants from Southern Europe (10.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Laotian (10.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Portuguese (10.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Albanian (10.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Argentinean (10.6%, a difference of 0.46%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are French (10.7%, a difference of 0.15%), South African (10.7%, a difference of 0.18%), Native Hawaiian (10.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Peruvian (10.7%, a difference of 0.23%), and Immigrants from China (10.7%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Poverty |
| Canadians | 91.6 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 91.3 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Laotians | 91.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Portuguese | 91.0 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Albanians | 90.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Argentineans | 90.1 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 89.8 /100 | #111 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 89.5 /100 | #112 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Palestinians | 89.1 /100 | #113 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 89.0 /100 | #114 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 88.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Sri Lankans | 88.1 /100 | #116 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 88.1 /100 | #117 | Excellent 10.6% |
| Okinawans | 87.6 /100 | #118 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 87.6 /100 | #119 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | China | 87.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Peruvians | 87.1 /100 | #121 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Native Hawaiians | 87.0 /100 | #122 | Excellent 10.7% |
| South Africans | 86.8 /100 | #123 | Excellent 10.7% |
| French | 86.7 /100 | #124 | Excellent 10.7% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 86.0 /100 | #125 | Excellent 10.7% |