Asian vs Turkish Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Asian
Turkish
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Asians
Turks
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
30th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Turkish Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,573,654 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.368 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 269,836,964 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.180 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 0.71%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Asian | Turkish |
Minimum | 0.65% | 0.17% |
Maximum | 30.3% | 57.0% |
Range | 29.6% | 56.9% |
Mean | 11.2% | 11.2% |
Median | 11.3% | 10.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 14.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Asians and Turks by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Russian (13.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Lithuanian (13.5%, a difference of 0.48%), Tongan (13.4%, a difference of 0.49%), Danish (13.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Northern Europe (13.6%, a difference of 0.72%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Danish (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Tongan (13.4%, a difference of 0.22%), Swedish (13.3%, a difference of 0.30%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and Immigrants from China (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.8 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Maltese | 99.8 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.8 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.1% |
Latvians | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Asians | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Croatians | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 13.8% |