Asian vs Immigrants from Jordan Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Asian
Immigrants from Jordan
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Asians
Immigrants from Jordan
13.5%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.6%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
78.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
150th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Asian vs Immigrants from Jordan Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,573,654 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Asians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.368 and weighted average of 13.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 180,809,646 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Jordan and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.644 and weighted average of 15.6%, a difference of 15.7%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Asian | Immigrants from Jordan |
Minimum | 0.65% | 0.79% |
Maximum | 30.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 29.6% | 99.2% |
Mean | 11.2% | 19.2% |
Median | 11.3% | 13.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.4% | 11.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.7% | 21.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 10.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.0% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.0% | 16.8% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Demographics Similar to Asians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Asians are Russian (13.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Lithuanian (13.5%, a difference of 0.48%), Tongan (13.4%, a difference of 0.49%), Danish (13.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and Turkish (13.4%, a difference of 0.71%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Asians | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Jordan by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Jordan are French (15.6%, a difference of 0.0%), French Canadian (15.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Venezuelan (15.6%, a difference of 0.19%), Samoan (15.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Israeli (15.5%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Icelanders | 82.5 /100 | #143 | Excellent 15.4% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 81.9 /100 | #144 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Peru | 81.7 /100 | #145 | Excellent 15.5% |
Slovaks | 81.4 /100 | #146 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 80.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 15.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 80.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 15.5% |
Israelis | 80.1 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.5% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 78.5 /100 | #150 | Good 15.6% |
French | 78.5 /100 | #151 | Good 15.6% |
French Canadians | 78.2 /100 | #152 | Good 15.6% |
Venezuelans | 77.4 /100 | #153 | Good 15.6% |
Samoans | 77.3 /100 | #154 | Good 15.6% |
Syrians | 76.1 /100 | #155 | Good 15.6% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 74.9 /100 | #156 | Good 15.7% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 72.9 /100 | #157 | Good 15.7% |