Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Sudan Family Poverty
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Immigrants from Sudan
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Immigrants from Sudan
10.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
2.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
232nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Sudan Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,790,128 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,923,711 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sudan and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.533 and weighted average of 10.1%, a difference of 0.43%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Immigrants from Sudan |
Minimum | 2.0% | 0.80% |
Maximum | 76.9% | 30.8% |
Range | 74.9% | 30.0% |
Mean | 18.8% | 11.4% |
Median | 14.0% | 9.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.1% | 14.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.6% | 6.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.5% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.3% | 6.4% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Immigrants from Sudan by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Sudanese (10.0%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and Ottawa (10.0%, a difference of 0.64%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sudan are Fijian (10.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.1%, a difference of 0.36%), Nigerian (10.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Nigeria (10.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.82%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 4.8 /100 | #221 | Tragic 9.9% |
Japanese | 4.8 /100 | #222 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |