Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Nigeria Family Poverty
COMPARE
Alaskan Athabascan
Immigrants from Nigeria
Family Poverty
Family Poverty Comparison
Alaskan Athabascans
Immigrants from Nigeria
10.1%
FAMILY POVERTY
2.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.2%
FAMILY POVERTY
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
236th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from Nigeria Family Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,790,128 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.454 and weighted average of 10.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,018,314 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nigeria and poverty level among families in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073 and weighted average of 10.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Family Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Alaskan Athabascan | Immigrants from Nigeria |
Minimum | 2.0% | 1.2% |
Maximum | 76.9% | 22.6% |
Range | 74.9% | 21.4% |
Mean | 18.8% | 9.8% |
Median | 14.0% | 9.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.5% | 7.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.1% | 12.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.6% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 16.5% | 4.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.3% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans and Immigrants from Nigeria by Family Poverty
In terms of family poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Immigrants from Panama (10.0%, a difference of 0.38%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (10.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Sudanese (10.0%, a difference of 0.41%), Immigrants from Sudan (10.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and Immigrants from Armenia (10.0%, a difference of 0.62%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Nigeria are Nigerian (10.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Laos (10.2%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (10.1%, a difference of 0.28%), Fijian (10.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and French American Indian (10.2%, a difference of 0.63%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Poverty |
Immigrants | Africa | 4.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 9.9% |
Marshallese | 3.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 9.9% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 10.0% |
Ottawa | 3.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 3.3 /100 | #227 | Tragic 10.0% |
Sudanese | 3.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 3.1 /100 | #229 | Tragic 10.0% |
Immigrants | Panama | 3.1 /100 | #230 | Tragic 10.0% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.7 /100 | #231 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 2.3 /100 | #232 | Tragic 10.1% |
Fijians | 2.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 2.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 10.1% |
Nigerians | 2.0 /100 | #235 | Tragic 10.1% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.9 /100 | #236 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 1.7 /100 | #237 | Tragic 10.2% |
French American Indians | 1.5 /100 | #238 | Tragic 10.2% |
Potawatomi | 1.5 /100 | #239 | Tragic 10.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 1.4 /100 | #240 | Tragic 10.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.3 /100 | #241 | Tragic 10.3% |
Alaska Natives | 1.0 /100 | #242 | Tragic 10.4% |
Nepalese | 0.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 10.4% |