Yup'ik vs Potawatomi In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Yup'ik
Potawatomi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Yup'ik
Potawatomi
62.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
316th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Yup'ik vs Potawatomi In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,964,003 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Yup'ik and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.276 and weighted average of 62.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,774,216 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.383 and weighted average of 62.8%, a difference of 0.22%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Yup'ik | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 32.3% | 27.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 74.5% |
Range | 67.7% | 47.4% |
Mean | 63.0% | 54.8% |
Median | 63.6% | 55.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 54.5% | 50.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 70.0% | 61.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 15.5% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.0% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.9% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Yup'ik and Potawatomi by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Yup'ik are Kiowa (62.4%, a difference of 0.45%), Yaqui (63.0%, a difference of 0.56%), Chickasaw (62.3%, a difference of 0.64%), Chippewa (63.1%, a difference of 0.66%), and Iroquois (63.2%, a difference of 0.79%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Yaqui (63.0%, a difference of 0.35%), Chippewa (63.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Iroquois (63.2%, a difference of 0.57%), Blackfeet (63.2%, a difference of 0.64%), and Shoshone (63.2%, a difference of 0.65%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #305 | Tragic 63.5% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #306 | Tragic 63.4% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #307 | Tragic 63.4% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #308 | Tragic 63.4% |
Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #309 | Tragic 63.3% |
Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #310 | Tragic 63.2% |
Blackfeet | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 63.2% |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 63.2% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 63.1% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 63.0% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 62.8% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 62.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 62.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 62.3% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 62.1% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 62.1% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 62.1% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 62.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 62.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 62.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.9% |