Creek vs Potawatomi In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Creek
Potawatomi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Creek
Potawatomi
61.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
330th/ 347
METRIC RANK
62.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
315th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Creek vs Potawatomi In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 178,467,646 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Creek and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.610 and weighted average of 61.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,774,216 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.383 and weighted average of 62.8%, a difference of 2.5%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Creek | Potawatomi |
Minimum | 22.8% | 27.1% |
Maximum | 82.0% | 74.5% |
Range | 59.2% | 47.4% |
Mean | 52.6% | 54.8% |
Median | 53.3% | 55.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 46.6% | 50.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 60.7% | 61.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 14.0% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 9.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.8% | 9.4% |
Demographics Similar to Creek and Potawatomi by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Creek are Choctaw (61.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Dutch West Indian (61.7%, a difference of 0.59%), Ute (60.9%, a difference of 0.71%), Cajun (61.8%, a difference of 0.74%), and Sioux (61.8%, a difference of 0.86%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Potawatomi are Yup'ik (62.7%, a difference of 0.22%), Yaqui (63.0%, a difference of 0.35%), Chippewa (63.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Iroquois (63.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and Kiowa (62.4%, a difference of 0.66%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 63.2% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 63.1% |
Yaqui | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 63.0% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 62.8% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 62.7% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 62.4% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 62.3% |
Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 62.1% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 62.1% |
Americans | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 62.1% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 62.0% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 62.0% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 62.0% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 61.9% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 61.8% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 61.8% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 61.7% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 61.5% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 61.3% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 60.9% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 60.8% |