Tohono O'odham vs Ute In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Ute
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Ute
77.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
78.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
340th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Ute In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,711,323 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 77.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,664,473 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Ute and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.362 and weighted average of 78.9%, a difference of 1.5%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Ute |
Minimum | 46.4% | 23.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 53.6% | 76.3% |
Mean | 77.1% | 73.4% |
Median | 78.3% | 75.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 66.3% | 61.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 91.1% | 86.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.8% | 24.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.1% | 20.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 19.6% |
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham and Ute by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Immigrants from Yemen (78.2%, a difference of 0.57%), Lumbee (77.3%, a difference of 0.60%), Yuman (77.1%, a difference of 0.84%), Apache (79.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and Pima (79.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ute are Apache (79.0%, a difference of 0.10%), Pima (79.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Yakama (79.1%, a difference of 0.25%), Native/Alaskan (79.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Marshallese (79.2%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |