Tohono O'odham vs Kiowa In Labor Force | Age 30-34
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Kiowa
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Kiowa
77.7%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
79.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 30-34
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Kiowa In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,711,323 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.012 and weighted average of 77.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,095,745 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Kiowa and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 30 and 34 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.227 and weighted average of 79.8%, a difference of 2.7%.
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Kiowa |
Minimum | 46.4% | 50.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 53.6% | 49.3% |
Mean | 77.1% | 76.5% |
Median | 78.3% | 78.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 66.3% | 69.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 91.1% | 82.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 24.8% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 17.1% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 16.7% | 10.8% |
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham and Kiowa by In Labor Force | Age 30-34
In terms of in labor force | age 30-34, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Immigrants from Yemen (78.2%, a difference of 0.57%), Lumbee (77.3%, a difference of 0.60%), Yuman (77.1%, a difference of 0.84%), Ute (78.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and Apache (79.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Kiowa are Houma (79.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Inupiat (79.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Pueblo (80.0%, a difference of 0.28%), Creek (80.4%, a difference of 0.68%), and Sioux (80.4%, a difference of 0.69%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 30-34 |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 80.7% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 80.4% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 80.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 80.0% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 79.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 79.8% |
Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.7% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.3% |
Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 79.2% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 79.2% |
Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 79.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 79.0% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 79.0% |
Ute | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 78.9% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 78.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 77.7% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 77.3% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 77.1% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 76.4% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 75.9% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |