Slavic vs Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Slavic
Costa Rican
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Slavs
Costa Ricans
85.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
93.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
91.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,808,387 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Slavs and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.106 and weighted average of 85.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,578,861 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 85.0%, a difference of 0.050%.
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slavic | Costa Rican |
Minimum | 37.3% | 71.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 62.7% | 28.9% |
Mean | 85.9% | 88.3% |
Median | 88.4% | 86.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 82.3% | 84.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 100.0% | 95.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.7% | 11.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 15.1% | 7.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.9% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Costa Ricans by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Egyptian (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Mongolian (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Bangladeshi (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Switzerland (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Japan (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Austria (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 94.6 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Romania | 94.6 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 94.3 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Mongolians | 94.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Bangladeshis | 94.0 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 93.9 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Egyptians | 93.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Slavs | 93.7 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Japan | 93.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 93.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 85.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 92.8 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Czechoslovakians | 92.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Austria | 91.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 85.0% |
New Zealanders | 91.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 91.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Senegalese | 90.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Irish | 90.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 85.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 90.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 85.0% |
South Africans | 88.9 /100 | #115 | Excellent 85.0% |