Dutch vs Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age 25-29
COMPARE
Dutch
Costa Rican
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Comparison
Dutch
Costa Ricans
84.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
84.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
123rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.0%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 25-29
91.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
109th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Dutch vs Costa Rican In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 553,362,639 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Dutch and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.244 and weighted average of 84.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,578,861 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Costa Ricans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.298 and weighted average of 85.0%, a difference of 0.13%.
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Dutch | Costa Rican |
| Minimum | 59.8% | 71.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 40.2% | 28.9% |
| Mean | 88.5% | 88.3% |
| Median | 88.4% | 86.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 84.5% | 84.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 94.2% | 95.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 11.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.2% | 7.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.2% | 7.8% |
Demographics Similar to Dutch and Costa Ricans by In Labor Force | Age 25-29
In terms of in labor force | age 25-29, the demographic groups most similar to Dutch are Scandinavian (84.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Iran (84.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Uruguayan (84.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Chile (84.9%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Singapore (84.9%, a difference of 0.010%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Costa Ricans are Immigrants from Austria (85.0%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), New Zealander (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (85.0%, a difference of 0.010%), and Czechoslovakian (85.0%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 25-29 |
| Czechoslovakians | 92.6 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 92.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 91.9 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Costa Ricans | 91.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| New Zealanders | 91.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 91.4 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Senegalese | 90.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Irish | 90.6 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 90.4 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| South Africans | 88.9 /100 | #115 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Chileans | 88.8 /100 | #116 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Belarus | 88.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Finns | 87.8 /100 | #118 | Excellent 85.0% |
| Filipinos | 87.1 /100 | #119 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 86.1 /100 | #120 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 85.6 /100 | #121 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Scandinavians | 85.1 /100 | #122 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Dutch | 84.9 /100 | #123 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 84.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Uruguayans | 84.7 /100 | #125 | Excellent 84.9% |
| Immigrants | Singapore | 84.4 /100 | #126 | Excellent 84.9% |