Serbian vs Bhutanese In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Serbian
Bhutanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Serbians
Bhutanese
65.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
63.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
168th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
86.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Serbian vs Bhutanese In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,655,125 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Serbians and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027 and weighted average of 65.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,605,488 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 65.5%, a difference of 0.36%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Serbian | Bhutanese |
Minimum | 14.4% | 52.7% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 82.4% |
Range | 85.6% | 29.7% |
Mean | 63.5% | 64.2% |
Median | 64.7% | 64.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.8% | 61.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 66.8% | 66.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.1% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.1% | 4.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.0% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Serbians and Bhutanese by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Serbians are Immigrants from Belarus (65.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Western Asia (65.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Kazakhstan (65.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Danish (65.3%, a difference of 0.070%), and South African (65.3%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Albania (65.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants (65.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Czech (65.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Yugoslavian (65.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from China (65.4%, a difference of 0.12%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |
Immigrants | Albania | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 65.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |
Czechs | 81.5 /100 | #151 | Excellent 65.4% |
Yugoslavians | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 65.4% |
Immigrants | China | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 65.4% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 78.3 /100 | #154 | Good 65.4% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 75.9 /100 | #156 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | Russia | 75.7 /100 | #157 | Good 65.3% |
Panamanians | 75.2 /100 | #158 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | Syria | 74.6 /100 | #159 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 73.5 /100 | #160 | Good 65.3% |
Australians | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 65.3% |
Albanians | 70.8 /100 | #162 | Good 65.3% |
South Africans | 69.8 /100 | #163 | Good 65.3% |
Danes | 68.8 /100 | #164 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 68.1 /100 | #165 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 67.3 /100 | #166 | Good 65.3% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 66.0 /100 | #167 | Good 65.2% |
Serbians | 63.5 /100 | #168 | Good 65.2% |