Samoan vs Bhutanese In Labor Force | Age > 16
COMPARE
Samoan
Bhutanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Comparison
Samoans
Bhutanese
65.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
90.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
141st/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE > 16
86.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
148th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Samoan vs Bhutanese In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 225,191,337 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Samoans and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.161 and weighted average of 65.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 455,605,488 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese and labor force participation rate among population ages 16 and over in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.115 and weighted average of 65.5%, a difference of 0.12%.
In Labor Force | Age > 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Samoan | Bhutanese |
| Minimum | 43.6% | 52.7% |
| Maximum | 78.1% | 82.4% |
| Range | 34.5% | 29.7% |
| Mean | 63.5% | 64.2% |
| Median | 65.1% | 64.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 60.5% | 61.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 67.8% | 66.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.3% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.6% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.5% | 4.6% |
Demographics Similar to Samoans and Bhutanese by In Labor Force | Age > 16
In terms of in labor force | age > 16, the demographic groups most similar to Samoans are Immigrants from Taiwan (65.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Indian (Asian) (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Latvian (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from West Indies (65.6%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Bhutanese are Immigrants from Albania (65.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Oceania (65.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Tlingit-Haida (65.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Cypriot (65.5%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Romania (65.5%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age > 16 |
| Costa Ricans | 93.2 /100 | #134 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Guatemalans | 92.5 /100 | #135 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 92.4 /100 | #136 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 92.4 /100 | #137 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | West Indies | 92.0 /100 | #138 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 90.8 /100 | #139 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 90.8 /100 | #140 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Samoans | 90.5 /100 | #141 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Indians (Asian) | 89.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Latvians | 89.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Romania | 88.6 /100 | #144 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 88.3 /100 | #145 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Cypriots | 88.2 /100 | #146 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 87.5 /100 | #147 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Bhutanese | 86.3 /100 | #148 | Excellent 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 85.7 /100 | #149 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 81.9 /100 | #150 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Czechs | 81.5 /100 | #151 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Yugoslavians | 81.3 /100 | #152 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | China | 80.5 /100 | #153 | Excellent 65.4% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 78.3 /100 | #154 | Good 65.4% |