Pueblo vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 16-19
COMPARE
Pueblo
Chickasaw
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Comparison
Pueblo
Chickasaw
34.9%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
2.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
243rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
38.3%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 16-19
97.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pueblo vs Chickasaw In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,984,829 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pueblo and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.041 and weighted average of 34.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,579,210 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 16 and 19 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171 and weighted average of 38.3%, a difference of 9.8%.
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pueblo | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 3.0% | 7.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 71.4% |
Range | 97.0% | 64.3% |
Mean | 39.3% | 36.5% |
Median | 35.8% | 37.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.9% | 29.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 47.8% | 42.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 25.9% | 13.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 23.7% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 23.5% | 13.0% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Demographics Similar to Pueblo by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Pueblo are Immigrants from Turkey (34.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Uruguayan (34.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Greece (34.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (34.9%, a difference of 0.10%), and Laotian (34.9%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Immigrants | Australia | 3.6 /100 | #236 | Tragic 35.1% |
Immigrants | India | 3.5 /100 | #237 | Tragic 35.0% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 3.4 /100 | #238 | Tragic 35.0% |
Inupiat | 3.2 /100 | #239 | Tragic 35.0% |
Immigrants | Central America | 3.0 /100 | #240 | Tragic 35.0% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 2.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 35.0% |
Uruguayans | 2.6 /100 | #242 | Tragic 34.9% |
Pueblo | 2.6 /100 | #243 | Tragic 34.9% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 2.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 34.9% |
Immigrants | Greece | 2.4 /100 | #245 | Tragic 34.9% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 2.4 /100 | #246 | Tragic 34.9% |
Laotians | 2.4 /100 | #247 | Tragic 34.9% |
Central Americans | 2.2 /100 | #248 | Tragic 34.8% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 2.2 /100 | #249 | Tragic 34.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 2.0 /100 | #250 | Tragic 34.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by In Labor Force | Age 16-19
In terms of in labor force | age 16-19, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Nepal (38.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (38.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Colville (38.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Bulgarian (38.3%, a difference of 0.060%), and Ukrainian (38.3%, a difference of 0.11%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 16-19 |
Maltese | 98.6 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 38.5% |
Crow | 98.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 38.5% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 98.5 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 38.5% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 98.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 38.4% |
Hawaiians | 98.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 38.4% |
Bulgarians | 97.9 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Colville | 97.9 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Chickasaw | 97.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 97.8 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 97.8 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 38.3% |
Ethiopians | 97.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 38.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 38.2% |
Seminole | 96.7 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 38.1% |
Immigrants | England | 96.4 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 38.1% |