Pueblo vs Chickasaw Disability
COMPARE
Pueblo
Chickasaw
Disability
Disability Comparison
Pueblo
Chickasaw
14.4%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
332nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
339th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pueblo vs Chickasaw Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,077,777 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pueblo and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.016 and weighted average of 14.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,689,192 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and percentage of population with a disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.496 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 5.0%.
Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Pueblo | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 4.5% | 8.6% |
Maximum | 41.2% | 52.4% |
Range | 36.7% | 43.9% |
Mean | 17.6% | 22.5% |
Median | 16.6% | 20.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.0% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 20.5% | 23.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.5% | 6.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Pueblo and Chickasaw by Disability
In terms of disability, the demographic groups most similar to Pueblo are Alaskan Athabascan (14.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Cajun (14.6%, a difference of 1.1%), Yuman (14.6%, a difference of 1.2%), Navajo (14.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and Potawatomi (14.2%, a difference of 1.9%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Choctaw (15.4%, a difference of 1.5%), Dutch West Indian (14.9%, a difference of 1.8%), Seminole (14.9%, a difference of 2.1%), Cherokee (14.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and Lumbee (15.5%, a difference of 2.3%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 14.2% |
Osage | 0.0 /100 | #326 | Tragic 14.2% |
Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #327 | Tragic 14.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 14.2% |
Potawatomi | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 14.2% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 14.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 14.4% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 14.4% |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 14.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 14.6% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 14.8% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 14.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 14.9% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 14.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 15.2% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 15.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 15.5% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 15.6% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 15.6% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 15.8% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 16.1% |