Pima vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Pima
Chinese
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Pima
Chinese
74.8%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
344th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
99.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
57th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Chinese In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,535,254 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Pima and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.046 and weighted average of 74.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,807,570 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.136 and weighted average of 85.1%, a difference of 13.7%.
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Chinese |
| Minimum | 9.3% | 64.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 90.7% | 35.3% |
| Mean | 73.8% | 85.0% |
| Median | 78.3% | 85.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.4% | 83.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.7% | 88.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.4% | 4.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 22.7% | 5.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 22.3% | 5.6% |
Similar Demographics by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Demographics Similar to Pima by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Yuman (74.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Tohono O'odham (74.1%, a difference of 0.96%), Navajo (73.8%, a difference of 1.3%), Immigrants from Yemen (76.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and Crow (76.5%, a difference of 2.2%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 79.2% |
| Yakama | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 79.0% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 78.9% |
| Arapaho | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 78.1% |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 77.9% |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 77.4% |
| Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 77.3% |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 77.0% |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 77.0% |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 76.5% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 76.3% |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 74.8% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 74.7% |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 74.1% |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 73.8% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Slovak (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Serbian (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Albanian (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Croatia (85.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and Turkish (85.1%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
| Thais | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.6 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Taiwanese | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Turks | 99.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Soviet Union | 99.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.5 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Chinese | 99.4 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Slovaks | 99.4 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Serbians | 99.4 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Albanians | 99.4 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 99.3 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 99.3 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 85.0% |
| Swedes | 99.2 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 85.0% |