Pima vs Chinese Median Household Income
COMPARE
Pima
Chinese
Median Household Income
Median Household Income Comparison
Pima
Chinese
$63,262
MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
$98,496
MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
33rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Pima vs Chinese Median Household Income Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,537,269 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Pima and median household income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.672 and weighted average of $63,262. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,799,903 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and median household income in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027 and weighted average of $98,496, a difference of 55.7%.
Median Household Income Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Pima | Chinese |
| Minimum | $26,339 | $42,222 |
| Maximum | $96,415 | $158,665 |
| Range | $70,076 | $116,443 |
| Mean | $53,826 | $95,906 |
| Median | $52,032 | $92,903 |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | $40,965 | $80,796 |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | $66,485 | $111,792 |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | $25,519 | $30,996 |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | $17,724 | $23,711 |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | $17,405 | $23,502 |
Similar Demographics by Median Household Income
Demographics Similar to Pima by Median Household Income
In terms of median household income, the demographic groups most similar to Pima are Crow ($63,681, a difference of 0.66%), Houma ($62,575, a difference of 1.1%), Pueblo ($64,692, a difference of 2.3%), Tohono O'odham ($61,663, a difference of 2.6%), and Hopi ($65,043, a difference of 2.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Median Household Income |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic $67,715 |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic $67,573 |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic $66,974 |
| Immigrants | Congo | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic $66,768 |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic $65,914 |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic $65,194 |
| Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic $65,043 |
| Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic $64,692 |
| Crow | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic $63,681 |
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic $63,262 |
| Houma | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic $62,575 |
| Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic $61,663 |
| Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic $59,197 |
| Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic $59,159 |
| Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic $54,644 |
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Median Household Income
In terms of median household income, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Immigrants from Denmark ($98,510, a difference of 0.010%), Russian ($98,008, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Switzerland ($97,979, a difference of 0.53%), Turkish ($99,389, a difference of 0.91%), and Immigrants from Pakistan ($97,528, a difference of 0.99%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Median Household Income |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional $100,306 |
| Bhutanese | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional $100,151 |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional $99,943 |
| Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional $99,933 |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional $99,813 |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional $99,389 |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional $98,510 |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional $98,496 |
| Russians | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional $98,008 |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional $97,979 |
| Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional $97,528 |
| Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional $97,311 |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional $97,297 |
| Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional $97,026 |
| Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional $97,015 |