Chickasaw vs Uruguayan In Labor Force | Age 20-24
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Uruguayan
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Comparison
Chickasaw
Uruguayans
74.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
10.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
74.6%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
15.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
210th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Uruguayan In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,683,013 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 74.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,780,215 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Uruguayans and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.494 and weighted average of 74.6%, a difference of 0.16%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chickasaw | Uruguayan |
Minimum | 44.1% | 55.3% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 55.9% | 44.7% |
Mean | 73.9% | 84.2% |
Median | 72.8% | 83.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.8% | 74.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.0% | 100.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.2% | 26.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 13.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Uruguayans by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In terms of in labor force | age 20-24, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Norway (74.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Peru (74.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Nepalese (74.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from India (74.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Chilean (74.5%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Uruguayans are Immigrants from Australia (74.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Uruguay (74.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Arab (74.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Albanian (74.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and Creek (74.5%, a difference of 0.050%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
Inupiat | 17.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 74.6% |
Sioux | 17.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 74.6% |
Albanians | 16.2 /100 | #207 | Poor 74.6% |
Immigrants | Uruguay | 15.8 /100 | #208 | Poor 74.6% |
Arabs | 15.8 /100 | #209 | Poor 74.6% |
Uruguayans | 15.1 /100 | #210 | Poor 74.6% |
Immigrants | Australia | 14.7 /100 | #211 | Poor 74.6% |
Creek | 13.3 /100 | #212 | Poor 74.5% |
Peruvians | 13.3 /100 | #213 | Poor 74.5% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 13.2 /100 | #214 | Poor 74.5% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 12.7 /100 | #215 | Poor 74.5% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 12.7 /100 | #216 | Poor 74.5% |
Chileans | 12.5 /100 | #217 | Poor 74.5% |
Immigrants | Peru | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 74.5% |
Nepalese | 10.5 /100 | #219 | Poor 74.5% |
Immigrants | Norway | 10.3 /100 | #220 | Poor 74.5% |
Chickasaw | 10.3 /100 | #221 | Poor 74.5% |
Immigrants | India | 9.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 74.4% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 7.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 74.4% |
Seminole | 6.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 74.3% |
Ghanaians | 6.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 74.3% |