Chickasaw vs Laotian In Labor Force | Age 20-24
COMPARE
Chickasaw
Laotian
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Comparison
Chickasaw
Laotians
74.5%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
10.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
74.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 20-24
3.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
235th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chickasaw vs Laotian In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,683,013 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.123 and weighted average of 74.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,808,189 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Laotians and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.492 and weighted average of 74.1%, a difference of 0.43%.
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chickasaw | Laotian |
| Minimum | 44.1% | 37.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 55.9% | 63.0% |
| Mean | 73.9% | 78.5% |
| Median | 72.8% | 74.4% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.8% | 71.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 83.0% | 85.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.2% | 14.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.1% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.0% | 14.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw and Laotians by In Labor Force | Age 20-24
In terms of in labor force | age 20-24, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Norway (74.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Peru (74.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Nepalese (74.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from India (74.4%, a difference of 0.020%), and Hispanic or Latino (74.4%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Laotians are Immigrants (74.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Chile (74.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from France (74.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Bermudan (74.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Switzerland (74.2%, a difference of 0.060%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 20-24 |
| Immigrants | Peru | 10.6 /100 | #218 | Poor 74.5% |
| Nepalese | 10.5 /100 | #219 | Poor 74.5% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 10.3 /100 | #220 | Poor 74.5% |
| Chickasaw | 10.3 /100 | #221 | Poor 74.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 9.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 74.4% |
| Hispanics or Latinos | 7.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 74.4% |
| Seminole | 6.9 /100 | #224 | Tragic 74.3% |
| Ghanaians | 6.2 /100 | #225 | Tragic 74.3% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 5.9 /100 | #226 | Tragic 74.3% |
| Immigrants | Ireland | 5.8 /100 | #227 | Tragic 74.3% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 5.1 /100 | #228 | Tragic 74.2% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 4.6 /100 | #229 | Tragic 74.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 4.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 74.2% |
| Immigrants | Greece | 4.1 /100 | #231 | Tragic 74.2% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 4.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 74.2% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 3.7 /100 | #233 | Tragic 74.1% |
| Immigrants | Immigrants | 3.6 /100 | #234 | Tragic 74.1% |
| Laotians | 3.5 /100 | #235 | Tragic 74.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 3.3 /100 | #236 | Tragic 74.1% |
| Bermudans | 3.2 /100 | #237 | Tragic 74.1% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 3.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 74.1% |