Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Immigrants from Oceania
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Immigrants from Oceania
36.8%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
345th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
44.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,730,067 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.357 and weighted average of 36.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,491,409 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259 and weighted average of 46.5%, a difference of 26.6%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 6.2% | 16.2% |
Maximum | 57.6% | 91.9% |
Range | 51.4% | 75.7% |
Mean | 32.0% | 44.8% |
Median | 35.6% | 46.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 21.8% | 40.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 40.1% | 48.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 18.3% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.3% | 13.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.1% | 13.5% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Hopi (36.5%, a difference of 0.58%), Pima (35.9%, a difference of 2.4%), Immigrants from Cabo Verde (37.8%, a difference of 2.9%), Pueblo (38.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and Immigrants from Dominican Republic (38.9%, a difference of 5.9%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 39.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 39.9% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 39.8% |
British West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 39.8% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 39.6% |
Cape Verdeans | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 39.6% |
Dominicans | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 39.5% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 39.1% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 39.0% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 38.9% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 38.2% |
Immigrants | Cabo Verde | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 37.8% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 36.8% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 36.5% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 35.9% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Costa Rican (46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |