Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married
COMPARE
Ghanaian
Immigrants from Oceania
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Ghanaians
Immigrants from Oceania
42.9%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
46.5%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
44.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
179th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ghanaian vs Immigrants from Oceania Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 190,682,082 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Ghanaians and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.283 and weighted average of 42.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,491,409 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259 and weighted average of 46.5%, a difference of 8.4%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ghanaian | Immigrants from Oceania |
Minimum | 14.9% | 16.2% |
Maximum | 72.9% | 91.9% |
Range | 58.0% | 75.7% |
Mean | 46.3% | 44.8% |
Median | 44.6% | 46.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 41.5% | 40.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 51.2% | 48.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.8% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.6% | 13.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.6% | 13.5% |
Similar Demographics by Currently Married
Demographics Similar to Ghanaians by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Ghanaians are Guatemalan (42.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Middle Africa (43.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Native/Alaskan (42.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and Immigrants from El Salvador (43.1%, a difference of 0.53%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 43.3% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 43.2% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 43.2% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 43.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 43.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 43.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Costa Rican (46.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Ottawa (46.5%, a difference of 0.060%), Potawatomi (46.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Chickasaw (46.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Hawaiian (46.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Aleuts | 52.0 /100 | #172 | Average 46.7% |
Tlingit-Haida | 51.2 /100 | #173 | Average 46.7% |
Peruvians | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 46.6% |
Hawaiians | 48.6 /100 | #176 | Average 46.6% |
Israelis | 48.6 /100 | #177 | Average 46.6% |
Chickasaw | 47.8 /100 | #178 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 44.6 /100 | #179 | Average 46.5% |
Costa Ricans | 43.7 /100 | #180 | Average 46.5% |
Ottawa | 43.0 /100 | #181 | Average 46.5% |
Potawatomi | 41.9 /100 | #182 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 39.7 /100 | #183 | Fair 46.5% |
Brazilians | 39.3 /100 | #184 | Fair 46.4% |
Mongolians | 37.6 /100 | #185 | Fair 46.4% |
Immigrants | Chile | 36.8 /100 | #186 | Fair 46.4% |