Subsaharan African vs Native/Alaskan Currently Married
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Native/Alaskan
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Natives/Alaskans
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.8%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
288th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Native/Alaskan Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 512,977,387 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Natives/Alaskans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.760 and weighted average of 42.8%, a difference of 0.52%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Subsaharan African | Native/Alaskan |
| Minimum | 1.8% | 19.1% |
| Maximum | 84.5% | 53.7% |
| Range | 82.7% | 34.6% |
| Mean | 40.3% | 38.9% |
| Median | 40.7% | 41.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 35.4% | 32.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.3% | 45.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 13.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.0% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Natives/Alaskans by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Natives/Alaskans are Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.24%), Guatemalan (42.9%, a difference of 0.27%), Ghanaian (42.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.36%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
| Apache | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
| Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Liberians | 0.0 /100 | #299 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #300 | Tragic 42.2% |