Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from El Salvador Currently Married
COMPARE
Subsaharan African
Immigrants from El Salvador
Currently Married
Currently Married Comparison
Sub-Saharan Africans
Immigrants from El Salvador
42.6%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
292nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.1%
CURRENTLY MARRIED
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
284th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Subsaharan African vs Immigrants from El Salvador Currently Married Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 508,112,533 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sub-Saharan Africans and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018 and weighted average of 42.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,815,519 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from El Salvador and percentage of population currently married in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.297 and weighted average of 43.1%, a difference of 1.3%.
Currently Married Correlation Summary
Measurement | Subsaharan African | Immigrants from El Salvador |
Minimum | 1.8% | 27.7% |
Maximum | 84.5% | 52.9% |
Range | 82.7% | 25.1% |
Mean | 40.3% | 41.9% |
Median | 40.7% | 42.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 35.4% | 38.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 44.3% | 44.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 5.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.0% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 4.8% |
Demographics Similar to Sub-Saharan Africans and Immigrants from El Salvador by Currently Married
In terms of currently married, the demographic groups most similar to Sub-Saharan Africans are Yuman (42.6%, a difference of 0.020%), Honduran (42.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Guatemala (42.6%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (42.7%, a difference of 0.27%), and Paiute (42.7%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from El Salvador are Kiowa (43.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Ecuador (43.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Apache (43.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Chippewa (43.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and Central American Indian (43.3%, a difference of 0.28%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Currently Married |
Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 43.3% |
Central American Indians | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 43.3% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 43.2% |
Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 43.2% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 43.2% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 43.2% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 43.1% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 43.0% |
Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.9% |
Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #287 | Tragic 42.9% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #288 | Tragic 42.8% |
Paiute | 0.0 /100 | #289 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 0.0 /100 | #290 | Tragic 42.7% |
Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #291 | Tragic 42.6% |
Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.0 /100 | #292 | Tragic 42.6% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #293 | Tragic 42.6% |
Hondurans | 0.0 /100 | #294 | Tragic 42.5% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.0 /100 | #295 | Tragic 42.4% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #296 | Tragic 42.3% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #297 | Tragic 42.2% |
Immigrants | Honduras | 0.0 /100 | #298 | Tragic 42.2% |