Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Mexico Family Households
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Immigrants from Mexico
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Sri Lankans
Immigrants from Mexico
67.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
69.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
6th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Immigrants from Mexico Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,096,493 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 67.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 513,403,563 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.410 and weighted average of 69.1%, a difference of 2.1%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Immigrants from Mexico |
Minimum | 42.7% | 38.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 57.3% | 61.8% |
Mean | 73.1% | 75.8% |
Median | 73.3% | 75.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 67.3% | 68.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 78.0% | 81.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 13.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 11.6% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Immigrants from Mexico by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Cuban (67.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Inupiat (67.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Pakistan (67.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Samoan (67.9%, a difference of 0.33%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (67.5%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Mexican (69.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Yuman (69.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Yakama (69.3%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from Fiji (68.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and Native Hawaiian (68.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 69.3% |
Yuman | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 69.3% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 69.1% |
Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 69.0% |
Immigrants | Fiji | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 68.8% |
Native Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 68.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Immigrants | Central America | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Koreans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 68.3% |
Pueblo | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 68.2% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 68.1% |
Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 68.0% |
Samoans | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 67.9% |
Inupiat | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 67.8% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 67.5% |