Sri Lankan vs Guamanian/Chamorro Family Households
COMPARE
Sri Lankan
Guamanian/Chamorro
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Sri Lankans
Guamanians/Chamorros
67.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.6%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
40th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sri Lankan vs Guamanian/Chamorro Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 440,096,493 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Sri Lankans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.334 and weighted average of 67.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,865,945 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Guamanians/Chamorros and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.377 and weighted average of 66.6%, a difference of 1.7%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sri Lankan | Guamanian/Chamorro |
Minimum | 42.7% | 47.0% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 57.3% | 53.0% |
Mean | 73.1% | 70.1% |
Median | 73.3% | 69.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 67.3% | 64.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 78.0% | 73.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.7% | 8.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.2% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Sri Lankans and Guamanians/Chamorros by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Sri Lankans are Cuban (67.7%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Pakistan (67.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (67.5%, a difference of 0.37%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (67.5%, a difference of 0.39%), and Immigrants from India (67.4%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Guamanians/Chamorros are Immigrants from Bolivia (66.6%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from El Salvador (67.0%, a difference of 0.58%), Mexican American Indian (67.0%, a difference of 0.60%), Tsimshian (67.1%, a difference of 0.70%), and Peruvian (67.1%, a difference of 0.77%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Sri Lankans | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 67.7% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 67.5% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 67.5% |
Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Hispanics or Latinos | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Hawaiians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Nicaraguans | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 67.4% |
Immigrants | Peru | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Nepalese | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Peruvians | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Mexican American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 67.0% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 67.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 66.6% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 66.6% |