South African vs Icelander Family Households
COMPARE
South African
Icelander
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
South Africans
Icelanders
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.3%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
0.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
257th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Icelander Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,542,946 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 63.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,626,619 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Icelanders and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.272 and weighted average of 63.3%, a difference of 0.30%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Icelander |
Minimum | 40.0% | 40.0% |
Maximum | 96.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 56.0% | 60.0% |
Mean | 68.7% | 69.1% |
Median | 65.1% | 67.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.7% | 62.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 81.0% | 77.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.3% | 14.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 12.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 12.7% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Icelanders by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Aleut (63.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Israel (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Icelanders are Luxembourger (63.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Potawatomi (63.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Barbados (63.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Dominican Republic (63.3%, a difference of 0.090%), and Slovak (63.3%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Japan | 1.4 /100 | #250 | Tragic 63.4% |
Taiwanese | 1.2 /100 | #251 | Tragic 63.3% |
Bahamians | 1.1 /100 | #252 | Tragic 63.3% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 1.0 /100 | #253 | Tragic 63.3% |
Slovaks | 1.0 /100 | #254 | Tragic 63.3% |
Potawatomi | 1.0 /100 | #255 | Tragic 63.3% |
Luxembourgers | 0.9 /100 | #256 | Tragic 63.3% |
Icelanders | 0.8 /100 | #257 | Tragic 63.3% |
Immigrants | Barbados | 0.7 /100 | #258 | Tragic 63.2% |