South African vs Aleut Family Households
COMPARE
South African
Aleut
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
South Africans
Aleuts
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
240th/ 347
METRIC RANK
63.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
1.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
239th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South African vs Aleut Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 182,542,946 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of South Africans and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 63.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,774,066 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Aleuts and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.361 and weighted average of 63.4%, a difference of 0.0%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | South African | Aleut |
Minimum | 40.0% | 19.2% |
Maximum | 96.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 56.0% | 80.8% |
Mean | 68.7% | 66.1% |
Median | 65.1% | 65.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 61.7% | 54.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 81.0% | 77.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 19.3% | 23.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.5% | 17.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.2% | 17.2% |
Demographics Similar to South Africans and Aleuts by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to South Africans are Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Israel (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Comanche (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Aleuts are Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Israel (63.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Comanche (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (63.5%, a difference of 0.030%), and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (63.4%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Bulgarians | 3.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 3.0 /100 | #230 | Tragic 63.6% |
Immigrants | Greece | 2.9 /100 | #231 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 2.6 /100 | #232 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.6 /100 | #233 | Tragic 63.5% |
Finns | 2.3 /100 | #234 | Tragic 63.5% |
Albanians | 2.2 /100 | #235 | Tragic 63.5% |
Ghanaians | 2.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 63.5% |
Comanche | 2.1 /100 | #237 | Tragic 63.5% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 2.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 63.5% |
Aleuts | 1.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 63.4% |
South Africans | 1.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 1.9 /100 | #241 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 1.8 /100 | #242 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 1.8 /100 | #243 | Tragic 63.4% |
Eastern Europeans | 1.6 /100 | #244 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Dominica | 1.6 /100 | #245 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Ghana | 1.6 /100 | #246 | Tragic 63.4% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 1.5 /100 | #247 | Tragic 63.4% |
Dominicans | 1.5 /100 | #248 | Tragic 63.4% |
Russians | 1.4 /100 | #249 | Tragic 63.4% |