Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Thai Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Thai
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Thais
66.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
67.2%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
34th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Thai Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,677,474 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 66.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 475,372,793 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Thais and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 67.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Thai |
Minimum | 37.9% | 48.8% |
Maximum | 97.0% | 97.0% |
Range | 59.0% | 48.2% |
Mean | 70.8% | 72.7% |
Median | 69.8% | 71.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.3% | 66.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.5% | 77.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.2% | 11.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia and Thais by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Immigrants from Venezuela (66.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Bolivian (66.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Navajo (66.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Native/Alaskan (66.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Arapaho (66.5%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Thais are Salvadoran (67.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Nepalese (67.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Tohono O'odham (67.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Peruvian (67.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Latin America (67.2%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Latin America | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Nepalese | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Salvadorans | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 67.2% |
Tohono O'odham | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Peruvians | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 67.1% |
Mexican American Indians | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 67.0% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 67.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 66.6% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 66.6% |
Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Apache | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Navajo | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |