Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Canada Family Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Immigrants from Canada
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Immigrants from Canada
66.4%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
49th/ 347
METRIC RANK
64.0%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
19.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
196th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Immigrants from Canada Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 472,677,474 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.325 and weighted average of 66.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 459,128,452 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Canada and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.322 and weighted average of 64.0%, a difference of 3.8%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from South Central Asia | Immigrants from Canada |
Minimum | 37.9% | 37.5% |
Maximum | 97.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 59.0% | 62.5% |
Mean | 70.8% | 65.7% |
Median | 69.8% | 63.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.3% | 54.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 75.5% | 73.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.2% | 19.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.0% | 16.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.0% | 16.2% |
Similar Demographics by Family Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Central Asia are Immigrants from Venezuela (66.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Bolivian (66.5%, a difference of 0.070%), Navajo (66.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Native/Alaskan (66.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and Arapaho (66.5%, a difference of 0.10%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Menominee | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Apache | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Venezuelans | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Bolivians | 100.0 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 66.5% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 100.0 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Navajo | 100.0 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Natives/Alaskans | 100.0 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 66.4% |
Colombians | 100.0 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 100.0 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 66.3% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Canada by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Canada are Seminole (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Polish (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Slavic (64.0%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from North America (64.0%, a difference of 0.020%), and Immigrants from Malaysia (64.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 25.3 /100 | #189 | Fair 64.1% |
Zimbabweans | 24.7 /100 | #190 | Fair 64.1% |
Arabs | 24.5 /100 | #191 | Fair 64.1% |
Lithuanians | 23.8 /100 | #192 | Fair 64.0% |
French | 23.7 /100 | #193 | Fair 64.0% |
Paiute | 22.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 64.0% |
Immigrants | North America | 20.0 /100 | #195 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Canada | 19.2 /100 | #196 | Poor 64.0% |
Seminole | 18.9 /100 | #197 | Poor 64.0% |
Poles | 18.9 /100 | #198 | Poor 64.0% |
Slavs | 18.6 /100 | #199 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 17.9 /100 | #200 | Poor 64.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 17.2 /100 | #201 | Poor 64.0% |
Iranians | 13.5 /100 | #202 | Poor 63.9% |
Norwegians | 13.2 /100 | #203 | Poor 63.9% |