Immigrants from Norway vs Iroquois Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Immigrants from Norway
Iroquois
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Immigrants from Norway
Iroquois
46.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
52.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Norway vs Iroquois Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 116,686,104 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Norway and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.298 and weighted average of 46.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,804 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 43.7%, a difference of 6.2%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Norway | Iroquois |
Minimum | 11.8% | 9.6% |
Maximum | 82.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 71.0% | 90.4% |
Mean | 54.3% | 45.4% |
Median | 56.2% | 46.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 46.3% | 40.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 59.8% | 52.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.6% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.2% | 17.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.9% | 17.0% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Norway by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Norway are Immigrants from Mexico (46.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Australia (46.5%, a difference of 0.10%), Immigrants from Chile (46.5%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Colombia (46.4%, a difference of 0.22%), and South American (46.6%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Cherokee | 65.7 /100 | #166 | Good 46.7% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 64.2 /100 | #167 | Good 46.7% |
Israelis | 62.3 /100 | #168 | Good 46.7% |
Spanish American Indians | 59.4 /100 | #169 | Average 46.6% |
South Americans | 58.0 /100 | #170 | Average 46.6% |
Immigrants | Chile | 55.7 /100 | #171 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Australia | 54.6 /100 | #172 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Norway | 52.0 /100 | #173 | Average 46.5% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 46.4% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 46.1 /100 | #175 | Average 46.4% |
Cajuns | 45.2 /100 | #176 | Average 46.4% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 43.8 /100 | #177 | Average 46.3% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 43.4 /100 | #178 | Average 46.3% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 43.0 /100 | #179 | Average 46.3% |
Mongolians | 42.0 /100 | #180 | Average 46.3% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cameroon (43.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaskan Athabascan (43.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Seminole | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.0% |
Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |