Chinese vs Iroquois Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Chinese
Iroquois
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Chinese
Iroquois
50.4%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
10th/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.7%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Iroquois Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,801,742 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128 and weighted average of 50.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,249,804 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iroquois and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.281 and weighted average of 43.7%, a difference of 15.1%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Iroquois |
Minimum | 35.3% | 9.6% |
Maximum | 63.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 27.8% | 90.4% |
Mean | 50.6% | 45.4% |
Median | 51.0% | 46.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 46.3% | 40.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 56.2% | 52.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.9% | 12.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.4% | 17.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.4% | 17.0% |
Similar Demographics by Married-couple Households
Demographics Similar to Chinese by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Pennsylvania German (50.4%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Pakistan (50.1%, a difference of 0.44%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (50.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Swiss (49.9%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Korea (49.9%, a difference of 0.98%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Thais | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 51.9% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 51.8% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 51.6% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 51.1% |
Filipinos | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 51.0% |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 50.6% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 50.4% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 50.4% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 50.1% |
Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 49.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 49.9% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 49.8% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 49.7% |
Swedes | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 49.7% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 49.6% |
Demographics Similar to Iroquois by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Iroquois are Central American Indian (43.8%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Cameroon (43.7%, a difference of 0.090%), Alaskan Athabascan (43.6%, a difference of 0.22%), and Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.23%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Seminole | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.0% |
Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |