Houma vs Yakama Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Houma
Yakama
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Houma
Yakama
44.6%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
1.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
45.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
5.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
213th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Yakama Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,791,862 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.269 and weighted average of 44.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,917,879 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Yakama and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.505 and weighted average of 45.2%, a difference of 1.3%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Houma | Yakama |
Minimum | 28.8% | 14.7% |
Maximum | 69.3% | 69.2% |
Range | 40.6% | 54.6% |
Mean | 47.5% | 48.0% |
Median | 47.3% | 46.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 41.3% | 44.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.8% | 52.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 12.5% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 10.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to Houma and Yakama by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Marshallese (44.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Soviet Union (44.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Latin America (44.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Kenyan (44.7%, a difference of 0.10%), and Salvadoran (44.7%, a difference of 0.22%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Yakama are Japanese (45.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nepal (45.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Portugal (45.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Panamanian (45.2%, a difference of 0.070%), and Immigrants from the Azores (45.2%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Creek | 6.4 /100 | #212 | Tragic 45.3% |
Yakama | 5.8 /100 | #213 | Tragic 45.2% |
Japanese | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 45.2% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 5.6 /100 | #215 | Tragic 45.2% |
Immigrants | Portugal | 5.6 /100 | #216 | Tragic 45.2% |
Panamanians | 5.5 /100 | #217 | Tragic 45.2% |
Immigrants | Azores | 5.3 /100 | #218 | Tragic 45.2% |
Nicaraguans | 5.3 /100 | #219 | Tragic 45.2% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 5.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 45.2% |
Tlingit-Haida | 4.9 /100 | #221 | Tragic 45.1% |
Immigrants | Laos | 4.6 /100 | #222 | Tragic 45.1% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.7 /100 | #223 | Tragic 44.9% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 2.6 /100 | #224 | Tragic 44.9% |
Dutch West Indians | 2.6 /100 | #225 | Tragic 44.9% |
Alsatians | 2.3 /100 | #226 | Tragic 44.8% |
Salvadorans | 1.9 /100 | #227 | Tragic 44.7% |
Kenyans | 1.7 /100 | #228 | Tragic 44.7% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 1.6 /100 | #229 | Tragic 44.7% |
Soviet Union | 1.6 /100 | #230 | Tragic 44.6% |
Houma | 1.5 /100 | #231 | Tragic 44.6% |
Marshallese | 1.5 /100 | #232 | Tragic 44.6% |