Houma vs Immigrants Family Households
COMPARE
Houma
Immigrants
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Houma
Immigrants
65.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
66.1%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Immigrants Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,793,599 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 65.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 577,097,366 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.425 and weighted average of 66.1%, a difference of 0.66%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Houma | Immigrants |
Minimum | 53.8% | 42.8% |
Maximum | 78.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 25.0% | 57.2% |
Mean | 67.7% | 68.6% |
Median | 67.8% | 67.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.0% | 64.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.2% | 72.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 8.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 8.5% |
Demographics Similar to Houma and Immigrants by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Burmese (65.7%, a difference of 0.050%), Laotian (65.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.17%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.22%), and Malaysian (65.9%, a difference of 0.24%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants are Immigrants from Hong Kong (66.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Pennsylvania German (66.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Asia (66.1%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Korea (66.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and South American (66.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 100.0 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 100.0 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 66.1% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 66.0% |
South Americans | 100.0 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Central Americans | 100.0 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Immigrants | Indonesia | 100.0 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 66.0% |
Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |