Houma vs Burmese Family Households
COMPARE
Houma
Burmese
Family Households
Family Households Comparison
Houma
Burmese
65.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
65.7%
FAMILY HOUSEHOLDS
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Houma vs Burmese Family Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,793,599 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.029 and weighted average of 65.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 464,897,249 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Burmese and percentage of family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.025 and weighted average of 65.7%, a difference of 0.050%.
Family Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Houma | Burmese |
| Minimum | 53.8% | 35.2% |
| Maximum | 78.8% | 100.0% |
| Range | 25.0% | 64.8% |
| Mean | 67.7% | 70.5% |
| Median | 67.8% | 70.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 65.0% | 63.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 71.2% | 79.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.3% | 15.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.2% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.1% | 12.5% |
Demographics Similar to Houma and Burmese by Family Households
In terms of family households, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Laotian (65.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South America (65.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Yaqui (65.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Costa Rica (65.6%, a difference of 0.16%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Burmese are Laotian (65.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Portuguese (65.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Bhutanese (65.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from the Azores (65.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from South America (65.6%, a difference of 0.17%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Family Households |
| Pima | 99.9 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Costa Ricans | 99.9 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Fijians | 99.9 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Filipinos | 99.9 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Japanese | 99.9 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Malaysians | 99.9 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Bhutanese | 99.9 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 65.9% |
| Portuguese | 99.9 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Laotians | 99.9 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 65.8% |
| Burmese | 99.9 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Houma | 99.9 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 65.7% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 99.8 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | South America | 99.8 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Yaqui | 99.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Immigrants | Costa Rica | 99.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Puget Sound Salish | 99.8 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 65.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.7 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Immigrants | Guyana | 99.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 65.5% |
| Americans | 99.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 65.5% |