Ecuadorian vs Central American Indian Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Central American Indian
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Ecuadorians
Central American Indians
43.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
43.8%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
258th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Central American Indian Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,636,169 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557 and weighted average of 43.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 326,060,937 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Central American Indians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.071 and weighted average of 43.8%, a difference of 0.65%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ecuadorian | Central American Indian |
Minimum | 29.3% | 20.1% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 86.0% |
Range | 70.7% | 65.9% |
Mean | 46.3% | 45.4% |
Median | 44.3% | 44.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 41.8% | 39.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.6% | 50.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 11.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 12.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 12.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Central American Indians by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Moroccan (43.5%, a difference of 0.040%), Native/Alaskan (43.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Bangladeshi (43.5%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (43.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and Cree (43.6%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central American Indians are Iroquois (43.7%, a difference of 0.030%), Blackfeet (43.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Cameroon (43.7%, a difference of 0.12%), Ugandan (43.8%, a difference of 0.20%), and Alaskan Athabascan (43.6%, a difference of 0.25%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
Seminole | 0.4 /100 | #252 | Tragic 44.0% |
Central Americans | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 43.9% |
Apache | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 43.9% |
Shoshone | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 43.9% |
Ugandans | 0.3 /100 | #256 | Tragic 43.8% |
Blackfeet | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 43.8% |
Central American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 43.8% |
Iroquois | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 43.7% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 43.7% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 43.6% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #262 | Tragic 43.6% |
Cree | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 43.6% |
Bangladeshis | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 43.5% |
Moroccans | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 43.5% |
Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 43.5% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.4% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.3% |
Yuman | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.3% |
Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.3% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.2% |