Ecuadorian vs Belizean Married-couple Households
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Belizean
Married-couple Households
Married-couple Households Comparison
Ecuadorians
Belizeans
43.5%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
266th/ 347
METRIC RANK
42.2%
MARRIED-COUPLE HOUSEHOLDS
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
286th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ecuadorian vs Belizean Married-couple Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 317,636,169 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Ecuadorians and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.557 and weighted average of 43.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 144,151,479 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Belizeans and percentage of married-couple family households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.276 and weighted average of 42.2%, a difference of 2.9%.
Married-couple Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ecuadorian | Belizean |
| Minimum | 29.3% | 17.1% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 66.5% |
| Range | 70.7% | 49.4% |
| Mean | 46.3% | 42.0% |
| Median | 44.3% | 41.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 41.8% | 38.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 49.6% | 46.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 8.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.3% | 8.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.2% | 8.3% |
Demographics Similar to Ecuadorians and Belizeans by Married-couple Households
In terms of married-couple households, the demographic groups most similar to Ecuadorians are Native/Alaskan (43.5%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (43.4%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Sierra Leone (43.3%, a difference of 0.36%), Yuman (43.3%, a difference of 0.41%), and Guatemalan (43.3%, a difference of 0.51%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Belizeans are Ghanaian (42.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Cheyenne (42.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Inupiat (42.4%, a difference of 0.39%), Bermudan (42.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and Immigrants from Guatemala (42.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Married-couple Households |
| Ecuadorians | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Natives/Alaskans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 43.5% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 43.4% |
| Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Yuman | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Guatemalans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 43.3% |
| Immigrants | Nigeria | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Ethiopians | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Nigerians | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 43.2% |
| Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 43.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Africa | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Sierra Leoneans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 42.9% |
| Immigrants | Guatemala | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 42.8% |
| Bermudans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Inupiat | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 42.4% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 42.3% |
| Ghanaians | 0.0 /100 | #285 | Tragic 42.2% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #286 | Tragic 42.2% |