Chinese vs Latvian Single Father Households
COMPARE
Chinese
Latvian
Single Father Households
Single Father Households Comparison
Chinese
Latvians
2.0%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.0%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
44th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Latvian Single Father Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,726,791 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 219,307,286 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Latvians and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.380 and weighted average of 2.0%, a difference of 1.7%.
Single Father Households Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Latvian |
Minimum | 0.52% | 0.31% |
Maximum | 4.6% | 15.6% |
Range | 4.1% | 15.2% |
Mean | 2.1% | 3.2% |
Median | 2.0% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 4.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 2.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.81% | 2.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.80% | 2.9% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Latvians by Single Father Households
In terms of single father households, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Israeli (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Bulgarian (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Japan (2.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and Turkish (2.0%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Latvians are Russian (2.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Grenada (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Lebanon (2.0%, a difference of 0.12%), Macedonian (2.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and Immigrants from Turkey (2.0%, a difference of 0.46%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Households |
Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Turks | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Albanians | 100.0 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 100.0 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 100.0 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 100.0 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Macedonians | 100.0 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Grenada | 100.0 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Latvians | 100.0 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Russians | 100.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 100.0 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.0% |