Chinese vs Immigrants from India Single Father Households
COMPARE
Chinese
Immigrants from India
Single Father Households
Single Father Households Comparison
Chinese
Immigrants from India
2.0%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
1.9%
SINGLE FATHER HOUSEHOLDS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
17th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Immigrants from India Single Father Households Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,726,791 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001 and weighted average of 2.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 429,563,662 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and percentage of single father households in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.401 and weighted average of 1.9%, a difference of 4.0%.
Single Father Households Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Immigrants from India |
| Minimum | 0.52% | 0.27% |
| Maximum | 4.6% | 2.8% |
| Range | 4.1% | 2.5% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 1.6% |
| Median | 2.0% | 1.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.5% | 1.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.6% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 0.67% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.81% | 0.55% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.80% | 0.54% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Immigrants from India by Single Father Households
In terms of single father households, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Israeli (2.0%, a difference of 0.040%), Cambodian (2.0%, a difference of 0.070%), Bulgarian (2.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Japan (2.0%, a difference of 0.18%), and Turkish (2.0%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Immigrants from Iran (1.9%, a difference of 0.23%), Immigrants from Eastern Asia (1.9%, a difference of 0.43%), Indian (Asian) (1.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Immigrants from Lithuania (1.9%, a difference of 0.58%), and Iranian (1.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Father Households |
| Immigrants | Lithuania | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Thais | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 1.9% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Russia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Eastern Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Bulgarians | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Israelis | 100.0 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Immigrants | Australia | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.0% |