Ugandan vs Immigrants from Hungary Vision Disability
COMPARE
Ugandan
Immigrants from Hungary
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Ugandans
Immigrants from Hungary
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
88.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
131st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Immigrants from Hungary Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,002,961 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,649,550 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hungary and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.095 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.68%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Immigrants from Hungary |
| Minimum | 0.51% | 0.26% |
| Maximum | 7.2% | 3.7% |
| Range | 6.7% | 3.5% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 1.9% |
| Median | 2.0% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 1.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 0.87% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 0.76% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 0.75% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Immigrants from Hungary by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Vietnam (2.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Croatian (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Polish (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Kenyan (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Philippines (2.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hungary are Immigrants from Kenya (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Cameroon (2.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Chile (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), New Zealander (2.1%, a difference of 0.080%), and Sudanese (2.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Kenyans | 92.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 90.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 90.4 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 90.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 89.8 /100 | #124 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 89.8 /100 | #125 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Peru | 89.5 /100 | #126 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Sudanese | 89.2 /100 | #127 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 89.0 /100 | #128 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 88.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 88.7 /100 | #130 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Hungary | 88.7 /100 | #131 | Excellent 2.1% |
| New Zealanders | 88.2 /100 | #132 | Excellent 2.1% |
| Syrians | 87.5 /100 | #133 | Excellent 2.1% |