Ugandan vs Carpatho Rusyn Vision Disability
COMPARE
Ugandan
Carpatho Rusyn
Vision Disability
Vision Disability Comparison
Ugandans
Carpatho Rusyns
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
92.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
116th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.1%
VISION DISABILITY
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
105th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Carpatho Rusyn Vision Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,002,961 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.147 and weighted average of 2.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,850,680 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and percentage of population with vision disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.448 and weighted average of 2.1%, a difference of 0.56%.
Vision Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ugandan | Carpatho Rusyn |
| Minimum | 0.51% | 0.42% |
| Maximum | 7.2% | 7.5% |
| Range | 6.7% | 7.1% |
| Mean | 2.1% | 2.5% |
| Median | 2.0% | 2.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.2% | 1.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.3% | 2.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.1% | 1.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.3% | 1.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.3% | 1.6% |
Demographics Similar to Ugandans and Carpatho Rusyns by Vision Disability
In terms of vision disability, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Vietnam (2.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Croatian (2.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Polish (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Kenyan (2.1%, a difference of 0.060%), and Immigrants from Denmark (2.1%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Immigrants from Italy (2.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Austria (2.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Swedish (2.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Danish (2.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Korean (2.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Vision Disability |
| Greeks | 95.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Albanians | 94.9 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Sri Lankans | 94.8 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Austria | 94.4 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Italy | 94.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 94.3 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Swedes | 94.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Danes | 94.2 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Koreans | 94.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Chileans | 94.0 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 93.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Peruvians | 93.5 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 92.9 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Kenyans | 92.5 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Croatians | 92.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 92.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Ugandans | 92.2 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Poles | 92.0 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 91.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Uganda | 91.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 2.1% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 91.0 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 2.1% |