Tongan vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Tongan
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Tongans
Immigrants from Eastern Asia
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
14th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Immigrants from Eastern Asia Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,876,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 499,616,873 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Asia and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.312 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tongan | Immigrants from Eastern Asia |
Minimum | 0.94% | 0.61% |
Maximum | 16.9% | 13.7% |
Range | 16.0% | 13.1% |
Mean | 5.8% | 5.1% |
Median | 5.4% | 4.8% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 5.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 1.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Tongans and Immigrants from Eastern Asia by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Asia are Burmese (5.3%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from China (5.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Okinawan (5.3%, a difference of 0.65%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and Immigrants from Korea (5.2%, a difference of 0.96%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |