Tongan vs Immigrants from China Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Tongan
Immigrants from China
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Tongans
Immigrants from China
5.4%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
23rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.3%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tongan vs Immigrants from China Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,876,651 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.120 and weighted average of 5.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,848,702 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.439 and weighted average of 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Tongan | Immigrants from China |
| Minimum | 0.94% | 0.61% |
| Maximum | 16.9% | 12.9% |
| Range | 16.0% | 12.3% |
| Mean | 5.8% | 5.1% |
| Median | 5.4% | 4.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.5% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 1.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.5% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.5% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Tongans and Immigrants from China by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Immigrants from Israel (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Saudi Arabia (5.4%, a difference of 0.090%), Zimbabwean (5.4%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Nepal (5.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and Asian (5.4%, a difference of 0.36%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.3%, a difference of 0.33%), Burmese (5.3%, a difference of 0.48%), Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.3%, a difference of 0.54%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%), and Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.4%, a difference of 0.88%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Iranians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Yup'ik | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Korea | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Okinawans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Indians (Asian) | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Ethiopians | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Kuwait | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Asians | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Cambodians | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 5.4% |