Tohono O'odham vs Houma Disability Age 35 to 64
COMPARE
Tohono O'odham
Houma
Disability Age 35 to 64
Disability Age 35 to 64 Comparison
Tohono O'odham
Houma
16.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
342nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.7%
DISABILITY AGE 35 TO 64
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
347th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Tohono O'odham vs Houma Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,717,576 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.388 and weighted average of 16.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,789,508 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Houma and percentage of population with a disability between the ages 34 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.824 and weighted average of 18.7%, a difference of 11.6%.
Disability Age 35 to 64 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Tohono O'odham | Houma |
Minimum | 8.7% | 10.2% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 57.5% |
Range | 91.3% | 47.3% |
Mean | 28.2% | 21.7% |
Median | 21.7% | 17.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 16.2% | 15.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 32.2% | 22.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 16.0% | 6.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 20.2% | 12.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.9% | 12.3% |
Demographics Similar to Tohono O'odham and Houma by Disability Age 35 to 64
In terms of disability age 35 to 64, the demographic groups most similar to Tohono O'odham are Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 0.86%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 1.2%), Choctaw (16.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Houma are Lumbee (17.6%, a difference of 5.9%), Kiowa (17.4%, a difference of 7.7%), Yup'ik (16.9%, a difference of 10.3%), Creek (16.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and Tsimshian (16.7%, a difference of 11.8%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Disability Age 35 to 64 |
Cajuns | 0.0 /100 | #328 | Tragic 15.3% |
Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 15.5% |
Navajo | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 15.5% |
Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 15.6% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 15.7% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 15.8% |
Colville | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 15.8% |
Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 15.9% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 15.9% |
Puerto Ricans | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 15.9% |
Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 16.1% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 16.1% |
Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 16.4% |
Tsimshian | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 16.7% |
Tohono O'odham | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 16.7% |
Creek | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 16.9% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #344 | Tragic 16.9% |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #345 | Tragic 17.4% |
Lumbee | 0.0 /100 | #346 | Tragic 17.6% |
Houma | 0.0 /100 | #347 | Tragic 18.7% |